An Analysis on Themes and Writing Techniques Essay Example for Free

An Analysis on Themes and Writing Techniques EssayExplain why George tells Nick the Story of the boy who ordered bergin. If this boy is actually George, explain why he does non tell Nick that the story is autobiographical. If the boy is non George, explain why he is so imp overished with Martha when she relates the story about the manuscript her father, the president of the college, would not let George publish. The play begins with George and Martha having just returned from a caller hosted by Marthas father, who is President of the college where George works as a professor. Martha has invited a new faculty fragment over for some drinks. It is later goed that their guests at the after-party be a younger couple Nick, the young, new professor at the Biology Department and his wife Honey. When Nick and Honey arrive, the seemingly innocent after-party evolves into a darkness of games, manipulation, confrontation and enlightenment for the two couples. As the night deepens, the effects of alcohol start to take over Martha and George. They start to reveal sensitive things about each another(prenominal) and their marriage. In Act Two of Whos Afraid of Virginia Woolf? George tells Nick the anecdote of a boy who once ordered bergin, killed his mother with a shotgun, and thus after a year, crashed into a tree and killed his father. This happens after Nick confides in George the truth in his conclusiveness to marry Honey. He revealed that he married Honey not because he loved her but a lot because of the prospect of moving up the social ladder. The play also reveals that Honey does not plan on having children and has been avoiding getting pregnant by taking contraceptive pills. The side effects of the pills give been making her wishy-washy all along. (KONKLE, 2003)The reason why George did not tell Nick the story of the boy is his story is that he was too ashamed to admit to himself as well as to other people his troubled ultimo for fear that he migh t be judged according to this incident. (KONKLE, 2003) Another reason why George disclosed the expound of the story of the boy who accidentally killed his parents to Nick is to point out to Nick that no matter how unadulterated or ideal things may seem on the surface in the present, in truth, there is no such thing as ideal or perfect. The reality of life is that things are bound to go wrong all the time and people need to be ready for anything.What matters is how one deals with these difficulties. Nothing is ageless in the world. Sometimes things go the way you expect them to be but they can go the other way. The save thing permanent is change. The best way to cope with change is to recognize it, assess the honesty of the circumstance, and learn to adjust accordingly. It is important to see the reality of the situation so that in case there are problems that need to be solved, the best way to come up with a proper issue is to acknowledge the gravity of the situation. Trying to cover flaws or problems will only worsenedn the situation.Oftentimes, when this happens, small problems that are left unsolved snowball into an avalanche that gets too big that it is bound to leave too much damage. George and Martha started out as a couple with so much promise of success in the future. However, things did not work out as they have planned and as expected. As such, they are having difficulty adjusting to this reality. kind of of accepting the reality of their predicament and exploring other alternatives to get them out of their pothole, so to speak, they chose to remain oblivious(p) to their situation.George and Martha are trapped in their illusion of perfection and are too proud to admit the truth. They are thus thrust deeper in to their pothole of problems. (KONKLE, 2003) George became upset with Martha when she told the story about his manuscript that her father would not let him publish because it checkd his inadequacies. George is a proud man and it is ver y typical of him to refuse to reveal anything that would make him seem the least bit incompetent. The reality of this situation brought out their frustrations. The incident also highlighted the scanty reality of the state of their affairs.Marthas bickering drew attention to how disappointed that George was not live up to her and her fathers expectations and that she was so disgruntled with her marriage with George. (KONKLE, 2003) What ensued between the two couples reveals the similarities, to some degree, in their marriages. The only difference is that Nick and Honey represent the beginning stages and George and Martha represent the latter. The conversations between the men and the confrontation scenes expose the flaws in both marriages. Through George and Martha, Nick and Honey were allowed to peek into the future state of their relationship.They realize that should they do nothing about the present state of their marriage, they could end up in a place worse than where George and Martha are. For George and Martha, Nick and Honey represent a slice of their past. It allowed them a glance back at the things that have happened, which brought them to where they currently are in their marriage.Reference ListKONKLE, L. (2003). Good, Better, Best, Bested The Failure of American Typology in Whos Afraid of Virginia Woolf? In B. J. Mann, Edward Albee A Casebook (p. 44). New York Routledge.