Risks management analysis during Construction stage and Operational Term Paper

Risks counselling analysis during Construction lay out and operable stage of the Channel Tunnel Project - Term Paper ExampleThis serves to mitigate the risk of option shortage for the visit, through the application of the principle of maximizing utilization of the resources, to ensure that they fit into the project schedule. platform monitoring and concur is yet another vital risk moderation concept under the complex body part phase, which entails consistent and regular evaluation of every single aspect of the project and the timely correction of every errors, to ensure that the construction process progresses without safety threats (Yan-juan, Ding-li, & Jian-jun, 2009 p3). This c each(prenominal)s for the full adoption and implementation of the principle of project caution discipline, which requires that he project, is monitored consistently in every single activity and aspect of implementation, to notice and eliminate all the issues that could be a risk factor to the proj ect. This is meant to avoid future problems, which could have been addressed at the in front stages (Clifton, 2011 p49). Operational Phase The operational phase entails the active implementation and management of the gains of the Channel Tunnel Project, which entails the control of excessive hierarchical bureaucracy, to ensure that the whole project is achieved without any undue complexities, which emanates from following the hierarchical hunting lodge within an organization (Eisner, 2000 p14). The minimization of the bureaucracy of the project ensures that unnecessary delays ar not experienced. The effective management of bureaucracy and hierarchical order of the project management process helps in the effective application of plan time and resources, thus mitigating the risks associated with resource shortages for the project. Focus on details forms another fundamental risk mitigation activity during the operational phase, considering that there is a high risk that issues tha t are of significance to the project susceptibility be overlooked during the operational stage, which are then set to cause problems after the closure stage of the project lifecycle (Canonico & Soderlund 2010, p795). The complete application of all details of the project operation can only be achieved through the implementation of full coordination between the project implementers. While people are working on different activities of the project, there is always a tendency to assume that the other party will accept a certain activity, and thus one party ignores the same (Winch, 2013 p5). This can only be subjugate through full coordinated operations. Proposals for improvement The first proposal touches on the management of the benefits obtainable from the project, since the benefits are a major source of conflict, especially between the implementers and the actors (Stannard, 1990 p47). The aspect of project benefit management extends beyond the construction and making the project operational, since it looks at the aftermath of having the project in place. The proposal is that project benefit management should be introduced as incentive towards making the project operational, by setting benefit acknowledgement as the main goal (ProQuest, 2012 p5). While the work of the project managers ends at the closure stage of the project lifecycle, the operation management, regarding the realization of the benefits from the project should be a continuous process, which ensures that all the parties to the project continuously thread the